Cognitive Dissonance: F for Fake
Over the last several years, two expressions have become popular insults when referring to players: fraud and exposed. Both show a clear lack of respect for the target, suggesting that player's skill is merely an illusion. It also showcases an increasing belief in the objectivity of skill in fighting games, an idea for which the measure is becoming increasingly ignored.
The idea of frauds or fakes in fighting games is often rooted most in a player's own grandiose opinion of themselves. If a player believes themselves good, but still loses, then clearly the rules of the game were broken or something altered those rules. A common modern excuse is to blame the tournament format for allowing “randomness.” This is where claims of “scrubby” play occur, where unexpected strategy throws a player off their game causing them to lose. Instead of admitting a lack of preparation or total understanding of the possible situations they could be put into, the losing player blames their opponent for being bad, of not playing with established methods of success, or claims they would succeed in a different format. The assertion amounts to little because the only true measure fighting games have for skill in a player-versus-player environment is wins and every player agreed to the format when they entered the event.